Grok
------

### 基于两汉经学的核心思想的陈京元“寻衅滋事罪”案分析评论  
### An Analysis of the Chen Jingyuan "Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble" Case Based on the Core Ideas of Han Dynasty Confucian Exegesis

**中文版**  
**Chinese Version**

两汉经学（Han Dynasty Confucian Exegesis），以董仲舒为今文经学代表，郑玄为古文经学代表，其核心思想是“天人合一”（heaven-human unity）和“经世致用”（practical application for statecraft），强调儒家经典（如《春秋》、《论语》）为社会秩序之本，道德源于“仁义礼智信”（benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, trust），司法须合天道与礼法，反对独断偏私，通过“春秋笔法”（Spring and Autumn style of writing）寓褒贬于史，言论自由为致用教化与仁政的工具，反对权威独断破坏经义和谐。本案中，陈京元博士因X平台转发艺术作品、时政观点等内容（粉丝不足百人、互动近零），被以“寻衅滋事罪”判处有期徒刑一年八个月，程序中充斥主观推定、剥夺自辩与选择性执法。从两汉经学视角，此案非经世仁政，而是独断权威背离天人合一：摧毁礼法表达，违背仁义教化与和谐的根本信念。

Han Dynasty Confucian Exegesis, represented by Dong Zhongshu for the New Text School and Zheng Xuan for the Old Text School, centered on "heaven-human unity" (tian ren he yi) and "practical application for statecraft" (jing shi zhi yong), stressing Confucian classics (e.g., *Spring and Autumn Annals*, *Analects*) as foundation of social order, morality from "benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, trust" (ren yi li zhi xin), judiciary aligning with heavenly way and ritual law, opposing arbitrary bias, using "Spring and Autumn style of writing" (chun qiu bi fa) to embed praise-blame in history, free speech as tool for practical moralization and benevolent governance, opposing authority fiat disrupting classics harmony. In this case, Dr. Chen Jingyuan, an independent scholar, was sentenced to one year and eight months' imprisonment for "picking quarrels and provoking trouble" due to forwarding artistic works and political commentary on X (formerly Twitter)—with fewer than 100 followers and near-zero engagement—amid procedural flaws like subjective presumption, denial of self-defense, and selective enforcement. From Han exegesis's viewpoint, this is not practical benevolent governance but arbitrary authority violating heaven-human unity: annihilating ritual expression, betraying benevolence moralization and harmony.

#### 一、两汉经学核心思想概述：天人合一与经世致用  
#### I. Overview of Han Dynasty Confucian Exegesis's Core Ideas: Heaven-Human Unity and Practical Application for Statecraft  

两汉经学的核心思想是“天人合一”：天道与人事相通，经学解释经典以指导社会治理，反对独断偏私，主张“仁义礼智信”为永恒价值，言论自由为致用教化与仁政的工具，通过春秋笔法寓褒贬于史实现道德教化。 董仲舒强调“天人感应”，郑玄注重考据训诂。 原则：天理人间合一、经世实学、道德教化，反对权威独断与偏私执法。

Han exegesis's core ideas are "heaven-human unity": heavenly way and human affairs interconnected, classics interpretation guiding social governance, opposing arbitrary bias, advocating "benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, trust" (ren yi li zhi xin) as eternal values, free speech as tool for practical moralization and benevolent governance, using Spring and Autumn style embedding praise-blame in history for moral education. Dong Zhongshu stressed "heaven-human response"; Zheng Xuan textual collation and exegesis. Principles: heavenly-human unity, practical classics learning, moral moralization, opposing arbitrary authority and biased enforcement.

#### 二、基于两汉经学核心思想评析本案  
#### II. Analysis of the Case Based on Han Dynasty Confucian Exegesis's Core Ideas  

1. **独断权威背离天人合一：违背仁义教化与春秋笔法原则**  
   两汉经学视天人合一为道德和谐，反对权威独断偏私。 本案判决将陈京元转发的情感表达（如讽刺帖）、理性观点（如智库报告）和艺术作品（如漫画隐喻）泛化为“虚假言论”，无证据证明危害，却以主观“明知”推定判“寻衅滋事”，背离天人。 账号数据显示零互动、无人间断裂，却被“梳理”为“铁证”，这正是董仲舒斥的失天道：司法未以春秋笔法寓褒贬于史，独断断案，摧毁仁义教化。 两汉经学若在，必判此不经世——非教化和谐，乃独断暴政。

1. **Arbitrary Authority Betraying Heaven-Human Unity: Violating Benevolent Moralization and Spring and Autumn Style Principles**  
   Han exegesis saw heaven-human unity as moral harmony, opposing arbitrary fiat bias. The judgment categorizes Dr. Chen's forwarded emotional expressions (e.g., satirical posts), rational opinions (e.g., think tank reports), and artistic works (e.g., metaphorical cartoons) as "false statements," without evidence of harm, presuming "knowing falsehood" for "picking quarrels," betraying heaven-human. Account data shows zero engagement, no human rupture, yet "collated" as "ironclad evidence"—precisely Dong Zhongshu's lost heavenly way critique: judiciary fails Spring and Autumn style embedding praise-blame in history, fiat ruling, annihilating benevolent moralization. Han exegesis would deem this non-practical—not moral harmony, but fiat tyranny.

2. **言论自由压制扭曲经世致用：背离实学考据与社会教化**  
   郑玄强调经世实学通过考据教化，反对官僚独断。 陈京元转发系实学表达（如复杂系统引用），以考据包容多元教化，却被禁自辩（庭审“闭嘴”）、拒转控控书，程序中“选择性执法”（党媒同类未责）压制实学，背离致用。 这违背两汉经学：道德需实证考据与教化行动，非外在规训；社会和谐需经世包容，非独断。 两汉经学批判：此案非法，乃对教化之战。

2. **Suppression of Free Speech Twisting Practical Application: Betraying Empirical Research and Social Moralization**  
   Zheng Xuan stressed practical classics learning via evidential moralization, opposing bureaucratic fiat. Dr. Chen's forwards embody empirical expression (e.g., complex systems citations), evidential inclusivity of diverse moralization, yet he was denied self-defense (courtroom "silencing"), his indictment letter rejected, and selective enforcement suppressed empirical (state media reposts unpunished), betraying application. This violates Han exegesis: morality requires evidential research and moralizing action, not external regulation; social harmony needs practical inclusivity, not fiat. Han exegesis indicts: this is unlawful, war on moralization.

3. **天人和谐失衡：荒谬警示与经世危机**  
   两汉经学视天人合一为经世灵魂。 陈京元Bio自嘲“作案工具”，帖文存网无人关注，却判20月，荒谬如董仲舒比喻“失天道如断礼”——推定“罪名”失和谐平衡，扭曲天人，制造危机。 这警示：失衡和谐，永固独断。

3. **Imbalanced Heaven-Human Harmony: Absurd Warning and Practical Crisis**  
   Han exegesis saw heaven-human unity as practical soul. Dr. Chen's bio mocks his account as a "tool of crime," with posts lingering online unheeded, yet earning 20 months—absurd like Dong Zhongshu's "lost heavenly way like broken ritual": presuming "crime" lacks harmonious balance, twisting heaven-human, breeding crisis. This warns: imbalanced harmony entrenches fiat.

#### 三、结语：重振经世教化，推动和谐新生  
#### III. Conclusion: Reviving Practical Moralization for Harmony's Rebirth  

两汉经学思想视本案为悲剧：独断背离天人，压制失教化，永固偏私危机。陈京元自辩如郑玄考据呼吁，重审恢复礼法包容，方能让社会在天理中新生。 如董仲舒所言：“天人合一。”唯有以此衡，方避“独断”成“公敌”，推动人文经世。

Han exegesis's ideas see this case as tragedy: fiat betrays heaven-human, suppression forfeits moralization, entrenching bias crisis. Dr. Chen's defense echoes Zheng Xuan's evidential call, urging retrial to restore ritual inclusivity, allowing society to rebirth in heavenly principle. As Dong Zhongshu stated: "Heaven-human unity." Only thus can we avert "arbitrariness" as "public enemy," advancing humanistic practical.