Large-scale violations of China’s Criminal Law and related laws
In this case, the indictment alone demonstrates that the public security investigation lacks concrete, objective factual evidence, and merely renders a vague finding that Dr. Chen Jingyuan “spread false information and disrupted social order.” The procuratorate, however, baselessly accuses Dr. Chen of “knowingly” spreading false information and causing “serious” disruption of public order. Furthermore, Prosecutor Ge Bin explicitly stated in court that he “had not conducted any verification and had no intention of doing so.” These facts clearly establish that Ge Bin and other prosecutors engaged in illegal and criminal acts, including intentional distortion of facts, fabrication of evidence, dereliction of duty, abuse of power, and fabrication of rumors and slander.
Furthermore, in his self-defense and accusation, Dr. Chen accuses Kunming’s public security, procuratorate, and courts of numerous criminal violations during the handling of the case. In his letter, he pointed out that during the entire process of handling the case, the relevant law enforcement personnel committed at least the following criminal acts: judicial corruption (a prosecutor has confessed to the crime), procedural violations (the “zero evidence” approach of “arresting first, then fabricating evidence” was initiated; no search warrant or arrest warrant was ever presented; the family members were not notified for many days after the arrest; insults, intimidation, beatings, corporal punishment, and abuse were basic means of law enforcement; trials were not open, defense was not allowed, and accusation and reporting materials were not transmitted, etc.), illegal detention, violent evidence collection, torture, abuse of power, distortion of facts, fabrication of evidence, slander, illegal arbitration, and provoking trouble, etc.
Refer to 1. Large-scale violations of China’s Criminal Law and related laws.