Chat2LLMs

Welcome to Chat2LLMs !

Let’s use Large Language Models to chat with Master of Laws !

---

Introduction

chat2llms is a research initiative that facilitates communication between large language models and legal professionals. Its goal is to leverage existing LLMs to analyze complex legal topics through concrete judicial cases, deepen understanding of legal disciplines, and explore the limitations and future development directions of current LLMs.

Note

This project is under development.

This project represents an attempt to apply LLMs to the study and analysis of specific judicial cases. We focus on a typical real-world judicial case [Refer to case Introduction] as our research subject. Using LLMs, we conduct detailed textual analysis of several formal legal documents from this case.

The objectives include:

• Converting unstructured legal texts into structured data (e.g., case type, party information, disputed issues, legal basis) and identifying legal entities and relationships (e.g., torts, roles of parties such as plaintiff/defendant/third party, timelines).

• Parsing the court’s reasoning chain of “facts → legal components → conclusions” to understand how facts are mapped to legal provisions.

• Conducting quality and compliance reviews of legal texts to detect formatting errors, incorrect legal citations, and logical inconsistencies.

• And so on.

Key Contributions:

• Technical Framework: Provides tools for integrating LLMs into legal analysis.

• Case-Driven Research: Demonstrates LLM performance in real-world legal scenarios.

• Critical Evaluation: Identifies gaps in LLM capabilities (e.g., nuanced legal interpretation) and proposes future improvements.

---

Contents

Code

• Usage
  • Basic Comparison
  • Command-Line Interface
• Installation
  • Requirements
• API documentation
  • chat2llms
• Contributing
  • Development Setup
  • Code Style

Case

• Introduction
• Legal Documents
  • The Procuratorate’s Indictment
    • it was found that:
    • This Procuratorate believes that
  • The First-Instance Judgment
    • The public prosecution organ alleged that:
    • The defendant, Chen Jingyuan, asserted that
    • This court believes that
    • the judgment is as follows:
  • The Final Criminal Ruling
    • The original defendant appealed and claimed that:
    • This Court believes that:
    • this Court rules as follows:
• Letters by Defendant
  • A Notice of Appeal
  • Self-Defense and Accusation from Prison: A Letter Written in Blood
    • I. Personal Resume
    • II. Preliminary Observations and Understanding of the Judicial Process
    • III. Objective Facts of the “Crime”
      • 1. Regarding the “Harmful Facts” and “Degree of Harm” of the “Crime”
      • 2. “Criminal Acts”: Spreading Rumors
        • (1) The first category of reposts consists of artistic works
        • (2) The 2nd category of reposts involves the expression of emotions
        • (3) The 3rd category is about rational understanding of the real-world.
        • (4) The 4th category are descriptions of historical or current realities
        • (5) All of the four categories of reposts are not my “knowing rumors”
      • 3. The Court’s hilarious performance
    • IV. Evaluation of My Subjective State: “Knowing” and “Intentional”
      • 1. My “Unknown Realm” is Boundless
      • 2. My Professional Field is Narrow but Unfathomable
      • 3. Does my professional credentials as a scholar and career trajectory per se constitute conclusive evidence of criminal conduct under the law?
    • V. Accusations and Reports
      • 1. Large-scale violations of China’s Criminal Law and related laws.
      • 2. Comprehensive infringement and brutal trampling of the basic rights granted to citizens by the Constitution.
      • 3. Comprehensive violation and denial of the Party and the state’s various lines, principles, and policies.
      • 4. Violation of the rules and discipline of the Communist Party of China.
    • VI. Personal Plan and Determination
• Preprocessing
  • Structured Legal Data
    • From Criminal Judgment
    • From Criminal Ruling
  • Legal Entities and Relationships
    • Legal Elements
    • Parties Involved
    • Timeline
    • Evidence Framework
    • Legal Entity Relationships
    • Key Conclusions
  • Judicial Logic and Legal Application
    • Legal Basis and Constitutive Elements
    • Fact → Legal Elements → Conclusion
      • Factual Findings
      • Mapping Facts to Legal Elements
        • Determination of “False Information”
        • Presumption of Subjective Intent
        • Determination of “Severe Disorder of Public Order”
      • Conclusion
    • Supplementary Logic in the Second-Instance Judgment
    • Critical Reflections
    • Summary
  • Quality and Compliance Review
    • Format Review
    • Legal Citation Review
    • Logical Consistency Review
    • Recommendations for Improvement
    • Conclusion

Chats

• Legal Documents Analysis
  • Analysis of the Indictment
  • Analysis of Criminal Judgment
  • Analysis of Criminal Ruling
  • Overall Documents Analysis
• Key Elements of the Crime “Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble”
  • Objective Criminal Conduct
    • Artistic Works
      • So-called “criminal evidence”
        • A cartoon of `the “Umbrella Girl”
        • A Paint in oils or watercolours related to Xi Jinping
      • Analysis and Evaluation
        • Overview of Chen Jingyuan’s Defense
        • Deficiencies and Errors in Law Enforcement’s Use of Artistic Works as Evidence for “Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble”
    • Subjective Emotions
      • So-called “criminal evidence”
        • A candlelight memorial image on June 4th
        • An offhand comment on the anti-corruption campaign
        • A netizen’s comments on the report about the professor Xu’s release​
      • Analysis and Evaluation
    • Rational Understanding
      • So-called “criminal evidence”
        • An academic Paper on Political Spectrum
        • A Link to the paper of “An Objective Evaluation of Xi Jinping”
        • U.S. President Donald Trump speech on “Evil of Communism”
        • U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo’s speech on Communist China
        • A article about “Self-funded fifty-centers” on CCP’s media
        • Some Papers by Professor Xu Zhangrun
      • Analysis and Evaluation
    • Description of Reality
      • So-called “criminal evidence”
        • The Selected Works of Mao
        • About the retire of Deng Xiaoping
        • The history of cooperation between China and Ukraine
        • CCP Ministerial Retiree’s Payslip
      • Analysis and Evaluation
    • Common Analysis
  • Result Requirement
    • Twitter account and data
    • Common Analysis
  • Subjective Intent
    • Common Analysis
• Accuse the Judicial Mafia
  • Large-scale violations of China’s Criminal Law and related laws
    • Illegal and criminal activities
      • Judicial corruption in the case
      • The Conducts of Ge Bin in court trial
      • Illegal accusations of the indictment
      • Detailed Analysis of Ge Bin’s Conduct
    • Analysis and Evaluation
  • Comprehensive infringement and trampling of the basic rights granted by the Constitution
    • Illegal and criminal activities
    • Analysis and Evaluation
  • Comprehensive violation and denial of the state’s various lines, principles, and policies
    • Illegal and criminal activities
    • Analysis and Evaluation
  • Violation of the discipline and rules of Chinese Communist Party
    • Illegal and criminal activities
    • Analysis and Evaluation
  • Overview of the accusations

Gaps

• Hallucination of LLMs
• Lack of Practical Understanding
• Absence of Value Judgments

---

Indices and tables

• Index

• Module Index

• Search Page